HYPE · MORPHO · ETHENA · MAPLE · ETHFI · SKY · JTO · HOOD · CARDS · DRV · DAM · MET · LASO HYPE · MORPHO · ETHENA · MAPLE · ETHFI · SKY · JTO · HOOD · CARDS · DRV · DAM · MET · LASO
Valuations

Derive (DRV): cheap-looking, but the cash barely reaches holders

A capable on-chain options and perps protocol, ex-Lyra, at a low headline value. But fees are small and falling, only a third reaches holders, and the whole positive case rests on a revenue recovery that has not happened. Grade CCC.

CCC
Composite

Cheap on the surface, thin underneath.

Derive is a competent on-chain options and perps protocol, from the team behind the old Lyra. The problem is not capability, it is cash: fees are small and falling, only about a third reaches token holders, and the entire positive case depends on a revenue recovery that has not shown up yet.

FDV / MCAPlow float
$123M / $82M
~26% circulating
REVENUE (TTM)-29% MoM
$3.0M
~$6.7M run-rate, falling
TO HOLDERSraised
35%
buyback share, up from 25%
TOP WALLETconcentrated
30.5%
likely treasury, unlabeled

What it is

Derive is an on-chain options and perpetuals protocol, built by the team behind the former Lyra. The technology is real. The catch is that its roughly $111M of TVL is mostly restaking and vault collateral rather than live options demand, so the headline size overstates how much trading actually runs through it.

The money problem

Trailing revenue is about $3.0M, and the last 30 days annualize to roughly $6.7M, down 29% month over month and 75% week over week. That is about 27 times fees on the trailing figure, 12 times on the run-rate. For context, GMX trades near 1.8 times and Hyperliquid near 22 times. And only about 35% of revenue reaches holders through the buyback, so on the cash that actually accrues the multiple is far higher.

Supply and the soft gate

Supply grew from 1B to 1.5B tokens, a 50% mint approved in September 2025. One mitigation: the team and contributor allocation can only be sold once the market cap clears $150M, about 1.8 times from here, which gives holders a soft gate against insider selling until the protocol grows into it.

ProtocolP / FeesRead
Derive~27xtrailing (12x on run-rate)
GMX~1.8xcheapest of the set
Hyperliquid~22xdominant, profitable
dYdX~76xpriciest

Fig 1 · Derive is not cheap on fees, despite the low headline cap.

Probability-weighted paths
Bull: on-chain options inflects, fees $15-25M, new-cycle multiple ($0.30-0.50)15%
Base: fees recover to a $6-8M run-rate, team gate cleared ($0.11-0.15)40%
Bear: fees stay ~$3M or fall, perps fail vs Hyperliquid ($0.04-0.05)45%

EXPECTED VALUE ~= 1.53x, BUT IT ALL RESTS ON THE BASE-CASE REVENUE RECOVERY

CONFIRMED

The buyback is live and was raised from 25% to 35% of revenue. More than 23M DRV has been repurchased to date.

OPEN

The top wallet holds 30.5% of supply. It is most likely a treasury or staking contract, but it is unlabeled, so treat the concentration as a known unknown.

THE BET

The positive expected value depends on fees recovering to a roughly $6-8M run-rate. Until that shows up, this is a value trap.

The call

Grade CCC. Optically cheap on its low headline cap, but expensive on the cash that actually reaches holders, and the positive expected value rests entirely on a revenue recovery plus reaching the $150M team-sale gate. If the base case fails, it collapses toward the bear. Watch monthly fees turning up and the buyback staying visible on-chain.

Confidence and what we could not verify

Moderate. Price, revenue and buyback data are well sourced. The top-wallet label is the main unknown, and the revenue trend is the swing factor.

FILED UNDER — Valuations · Economics · Perps · DRV
Weekly alpha

Get the next teardown in your inbox.

More from

Valuations

GAM Analysis

Independent DeFi protocol research. Code + Economics.

Desks
Elsewhere
X @galborta About Subscribe RSS
© 2026 GAM Analysis · Independent DeFi protocol research · Code + Economics